ManWithDinosaurs

Anthropology Series: Hidden Origin of Homo Sapiens

 

Geochronology – Hiding History in the Past

CHAPTER FOUR

Part 1 of the Anthropology Series on the Hidden Origin of Homo Sapiens

 

Here is the first installment of daniel’s research into Anthropology, dealing with the hidden origins of homo sapiens. Daniel tells me this is the first in a series of papers explaining the misconceptions of modern science resulting from their habit of getting things backwards… as daniel likes to comment of his own learning experiences, “everything we know is wrong.”

 

Daniel of course, is not the only researcher out there observing and challenging the status quo of the establishment’s version of history, physics, and scientific academia. In fact, many others are starting down this path in search of the factual and provable truth which have been purposefully and intricately hidden from nearly all of humanity for millennia.

 

For me personally, this is yet another eye opening piece that sheds more light on the path in front of me, as I continue on my journey and discovery of just how much Everything We Know is Wrong. I learned a long time ago that people do not “wake up” from being told the facts or having the map laid out in front of them; they awaken from the discovery of the facts and the map along the path. And daniel dumps one heck of a map on us to discover, with this update to how we view history.

 

What if we are not hundreds of thousands of years Old, but instead discover that we, human beings, are less than 6,000 years Young? Hmm, crazy right? Well perhaps NOT so crazy after all. What if the Earth is not an old gal, hitting her 4.7 billionth birthday? Backwards astronomy, backwards age… we’re actually the new kid on the block, with a civilization that is getting ready to move out of their parent’s basement and take on a Universe.

 

Our true history is the needle and the past is the haystack. If you wanted to “Hide History in the Past”, a 4.47 billion year-old haystack is one, HUGE haystack! Now what if the haystack was not four and a half billion years, but rather a few hundred thousand years young?

 

If you are like me, and ready to tackle the tiny haystack to find our needle, let us lock arms together, once again, and take it from the beginning with:

 

  • Discovering just how Young our Solar System, Earth, and History are 

  • Correcting and Correlating history to a timeline where science, religion and mythology all match up

  • The events creating the solar system matching the Dominance of Gods 

  • Adam & Eve as the first Cro-Magnons 

  • Destructions of Atlantis matching up with the Hebrew Exodus and the Deluge 

  • The stuff planets are made of—and how they behave in a solar system 

  • The not-so-natural origin of Moons

 

So read on and remember, this is just “Part 1!”

 

 

Join us in the ConsciousHugs FORUM

Forum Sidebar

47 Comments

  • Wow! What an outstanding piece of work, Daniel! Seems logical and entirely plausible to me. I will restart my read of Mr. Larson’s works, with a heightened sense of their importance. Thank you for your efforts, Daniel, and please keep up the outstanding work.

    Reply
    • Thanks, John. I try my best with some very difficult topics.

      Dewey Larson was a truly brilliant man; way ahead of his time. His books certainly changed my life, as without them, I could never have made any sense of the strange things I’ve experienced.

      First book I read was “New Light on Space and Time,” and the concept that “light was still and it was everything else that was moving” really blew my mind. Now it makes perfect sense. And the dirt simple explanation of gravity in “Beyond Newton” was also a real eye opener. Once you understand how big a part “time” plays in our experience, the world actually gets a lot simpler.

      Reply
      • Are those books by Dewey Larson available as free ebooks?

        Reply
        • The references in the PDF are clickable to papers and sections of online books. A couple of Larson’s books are available as PDFs that are free for private use (please do not upload) on Reciprocalsystem.org. I would not use the junk copies on scribd, as they are full of errors.

          Reply
      • This site is awesome. My spouse and i constantly come across a new challenge & diverse in this article.Well I’m glad to have helped. And Nice blog.

        Reply
  • Daniel Thank you so much for your effort with this article, it is so good of you to share your perceptions, I have always believed in the expanding Earth Theory. Again thank you for Be’ing.

    Reply
  • Hey Daniel, just wanted to say thank you for sharing all of this with the world, it has been some of the most interesting material I’ve ever come across. One thing I can’t figure out is where do the dinosaurs fir into this model?

    Reply
    • Dinosaurs will be in Part 2, which I cut from this paper because the RS2 folks have not had time to finish the radiometric dating corrections of the early Epochs yet.

      Reply
  • hello daniel, Thank you so much for your paper the are if not anything illuminating. I was just wondering if you could say anything about the country India

    Reply
    • Well, my best friend is from Bangalore and we’ve talked much about India, particularly the very high correlation between the Norse/Germanic gods and the Vedic ones, such as AEsir-Asura, Vanir-Vanaara, etc. That will come up in a later paper that shows that all the religions appear to be talking about the same “gods”–with one, interesting exception: Hanuman.

      Reply
      • Thank you for all of this Daniel. How does all of this fit in with the Electric Universe model that I am sure you are familiar with. Best Wishes. Bill…

        Reply
  • Wooow, thankyou so much Daniel.
    I first read Velikovsky in the 70s then went on to Von Daniken, Cayce, Seth, Sitchen etc. trying to join the dots so your article just blew me away. I’m impatient to read your next installment.
    Elaine

    Reply
  • What amaze me is the ring of Truth that I sense while reading all your papers, Daniel and this is both challenging and confusing for me, I used to believe that I had a good grasp of physic concepts and laws only to realise now that I have been hoodwinked by a corrupt and treacherous chorus of mischivious bables, while the true and important research, the paradigm changing knowledge has been arrested, marginalised or exploited in shadowy black projects.
    I want to express my gratitude and admiration for your fantastic gift to us all and your truly brave stance under circumstances that I know are not to be threaded on lightly!
    E pur si muove !
    Thank you very much, I wait for your next installment with divine anticipation !

    Cristian Man

    Reply
  • Daniel! I’ve been waiting so long for this to come out- thank you! What’s next in your series? I cannot being to explain to you how much I love reading your material!

    Reply
    • Right now, I am working on 3 other parts; not sure which one will get done first. Depends on when other contributors from the scientific underground get back to me, regarding the various topics. Part 2 on Prehistory (dinosaurs, arrival of the gods, Atlantis) will probably be next.

      Reply
  • Thanks for all of this. It’s really quite fantastic stuff.

    I know you’ve said that the asteroid belt could never have been a habitable planet, but what about Maldak theory?

    Reply
    • I find the Maldek theory to be just that, theory. I think they got the right planet, but the wrong solar system.

      Reply
  • Daniel, take my gratitude and admiration. Great gift you give us. You sure know, that we read your papers all over the planet, good people translate them for those non english understanding rest. Wish you all the best and light for your future work. Thanks!!!

    Reply
    • Hi Luba, daniel and I have also been looking into getting these papers translated into other languages. If you know someone who has already been translating these internationally, could you please put them in touch with me at chstuff@conscioushugs.com ? Thank you so much, Aaron

      Reply
    • Yes, please contact Aaron–we’d love to put a copy of the translations on the website, as there are a lot of inquiries about the papers in other languages.

      Reply
  • This essay is truly fantastic! I’ve been looking forward to reading it for some time — definitely worth the wait!
    On a side note, I was wondering if you would care to comment on any connection between solar activity and geologic activity, specifically earthquakes. A user by the name of Suspicious0bservers makes daily videos on YouTube in regards to news around the world, particularly about Solar activity. He theorizes that solar flares, CME’s (etc.) induce earthquakes from the disturbances they create in the magnetoshpere. I was curious if you had anything to say on the subject and if it has any relation to the core makeup of the Earth as you discussed it in your essay!

    Reply
    • Here, here Wes!

      I, too, am interested in any correlation between earthquakes and solar activity.

      Mentions of Keshe in the paper (Daniel) and Wes, your mention of Suspicious0bservers from YouTube are interesting, as I’ve currently been feeling resonance from both those sources.

      Over at Removing the Shackles, there is talk of the OPPT and their UCC filings.

      Any comment on this subject would be most excellent.

      ILLUMINATE YOURSELF \/ SHARE YOUR LIGHT

      Reply
      • Hi Jordan, I’m looking for this or any review, written about kesche, can I indicate in which video auspices of 00 is such a comment please someone wants to replicate this

        Reply
    • If Larson’s astronomy is correct, the cores of all the planets, though distributed in space, are still localized in time–that means there is a strong correlation between everything in the solar system. Sort of like the EPR paradox on a planetary scale. We’re all connected together in this Matrix.

      Reply
  • How does this fit in with the work of David Talbott and Immanuel Velikovsky? Was Saturn, Venus and Mars closer to the earth? How do you explain the widespread Saturn symbolism that is present in our history?

    Reply
    • Velikovsky has been a long-time inspiration for me; his research into ancient cultures is fascinating. The only problem was that he believed the “backwards astronomy,” and had to create Grecian-style epicycles to explain things, when more obvious explanations were available when you flip it around.

      Initially, when Saturn became dominant, it was extraordinarily bright and the ring systems were like their stellar counterparts–lit up, so also very obvious to observers on Earth. People would associate events with its presence, so various symbolism developed around Saturn, particularly as the “horned beast” or the “bearded watcher.”

      Reply
  • Hi Daniel,
    I have a few questions which I hope you dont mind. My first question is why you did not post your papers on David’s blog since he is the only reason anyone knows about you and also he has a far larger readership then originally soldier hugs who is and was unknown to most? And who doesn’t use his real name how could you trust its not ‘black ops’ running the site (no offense to soldier hugs) but a very logical conclusion since ‘black ops’, cia, dhs etc. run alot of sites for disinfo, data collection, persons of interest collection, etc.

    For my questions on the paper I have many but I’ll just ask 3.

    1. If ALL solar systems are exactly the same then how do most solar systems have binary stars and even triple stars?

    2. Alex Collier and several other trustworthy contactees, state their ETs have a far different view of the history of this planet then you. And dont seem to agree with your theory of Reciprocal System of history. As in they say humans have been on this planet for longer then what the mainstream will admit and that Atlantis and Limera (dont know how to spell it) were far older.

    3. How do you explain rock layers and sediment layers and how can we find bones and such far deeper then 3,000 b.c. But more importantly human artifacts in millions of years old sediment? (and I am sure if you were in ‘black ops’ then you would know of many, many, many more discoveries of artifacts and the like that have been found that was not aloud to come to the public or even academics eyes)

    And lastly Zacheria Stitchin has been proven to be a fraud and actually worked for the government which seriously makes me doubt your authenticity since you should know this if you were ‘black ops’! The government told him to purposely make a fraudulent translation of the sumerian texts! So to use him in your paper is suspicious.

    Thanks,
    geeksquad

    Reply
    • David was sent a copy of the paper when I released it. I believe he was getting ready for a conference, so I guess he never had any time to do anything with it and he’s now probably in his post-conference crash. You should bug him about it. He already knows about most of this stuff, as I told him about it years ago.

      Regarding SoldierHugs/ConsciousHugs; not a problem, as I maintain the server. I got to know the owner, Aaron, because of PHP errors on the old site that he could not fix. Outside of David Wilcock, he’s about the only other person on the planet that knows a lot of details about the hidden sciences I am attempting to bring out. And he still hasn’t tried to buy my silence with millions of dollars yet–Aaron, get with it! Got bills to pay!

      1. If ALL solar systems are exactly the same then how do most solar systems have binary stars and even triple stars?

      They are not EXACTLY the same; they have the same general structure, but not all the “options” are used. When binaries get older, the probability of forming a solar system diminishes, and you end up with triplets, quadruplets… I believe they have even found up to a dozen stars in a group in the older regions of the galaxy, nearer the central hub. I’d refer you to Larson’s “Universe of Motion” for the details.

      Alex Collier and several other trustworthy contactees, state their ETs have a far different view of the history of this planet then you. And dont seem to agree with your theory of Reciprocal System of history. As in they say humans have been on this planet for longer then what the mainstream will admit and that Atlantis and Limera (dont know how to spell it) were far older.

      Everyone has their opinion. None of the information I use is from ET or channeled sources; it comes from logical deduction guided by information I was exposed to during the Phoenix III project. I will cross-reference such material, as in the case of the Law of One (Ra was the only channeled source I found that also indicated stellar evolution was backwards). Though if you like, tell Alex to have his ETs drop by for lunch, and we’ll discuss it. I’ll even pick up the check.

      How do you explain rock layers and sediment layers and how can we find bones and such far deeper then 3,000 b.c. But more importantly human artifacts in millions of years old sediment? (and I am sure if you were in ‘black ops’ then you would know of many, many, many more discoveries of artifacts and the like that have been found that was not aloud to come to the public or even academics eyes)

      The geochronology is wrong; the rock and sediment layers are not that old. That is what I was trying to explain in the paper–radioactive half-lives, which they use to generate these dates, are based on a bad assumption. The human artifacts are in thousands-of-year-old sediment, not millions.

      One of the difficulties we had during Phoenix III was the limited temporal range of the equipment, before it screwed up. I think the upper limit was 6037, before everything “froze” (where the horse statue is–that looks a LOT like the horse at Denver International Airport). Of course, the other end was about 4000 BCE where there was a planetary catastrophe. There was something about the nature of the catastrophe that kept the equipment from probing beyond that point without freezing. And you know what? They did not find humans there. Because they believed the “accepted history,” it was assumed that mankind had gotten wiped out by the disaster, and only pockets of humanity remained, to grow back to what we have today. Yet, the Neanderthals were abundant, with quite a society. Not much “added up” until we ran across Larson’s description of radioactivity, and realized that the geochronology was all wrong and we were looking at the creation of Cro-Magnon man as a hybrid critter, better suited to the post-catastrophe environment.

      Yes, I’ve seen some remarkable artifacts. Hitler actually collected a huge amount of stuff, worldwide, which was scarfed up by the Americans and Russians and locked away, because most of it was the technology of the “gods” which could not be allowed in the general population. They also destroyed a HUGE amount of it.

      Reply
    • And lastly Zacheria Stitchin has been proven to be a fraud and actually worked for the government which seriously makes me doubt your authenticity since you should know this if you were ‘black ops’! The government told him to purposely make a fraudulent translation of the sumerian texts! So to use him in your paper is suspicious.

      I would like to see that “proof”… sounds ridiculous to me. Heck, I was reading “The 12th Planet” AT Montauk during my breaks! Nobody ever said anything to me; quite the contrary, a lot of people there became interested in it because it helped to explain a lot of the stuff we were getting back from temporal observations.

      And I wasn’t a super-secret high-level “black ops” insider… I was a contract technician. If the janitor knew it, I knew it. And I’m sure the high-level bigshots kept all the janitors informed of their secret disinformation agents.

      Reply
  • Hi, Daniel. I just wanted to express my thanks that you’re sharing this kind of information. Reading it gives me chills and the kind of soul recognition feeling that I got when I first started discovering this sort of material. Thank you so much.

    Reply
  • Thank you Daniel. in page 3 paragraph 2 line 2 : Since the atom is exploding over and over again in 3D time”.. you meant 3D space?
    Respect from Libya

    Reply
    • in page 3 paragraph 2 line 2 : Since the atom is exploding over and over again in 3D time”.. you meant 3D space?

      The atom has its structure in 3D time, and only has “location” in 3D space. Since a location is nothing more than a point (zero dimensions), there is nothing in space that CAN explode. The only way an atom can come apart is for the temporal structure to dissociate, creating additional locations in space for each bit that can give a measurable, spatial separation.

      As an analogy, take a basket of apples and set it on a tiled, kitchen floor. The grid of the tiles gives a spatial coordinate system, but all the apples are in one basket, and are not part of the floor. (The basket would be Larson’s “time region.”) Now take some apples out of the basket, and put them on other spots on the floor. That’s your explosion–you have to take the stuff out of the 3D time “basket” in order to move them in 3D space.

      Reply
  • Hello there!

    I wanted to sincerely thank daniel and others for the feedback I received on my previous comment.

    I want to offer some additional material in regards to developing news in science, and see how they correlate to what daniel has expressed in his latest piece.

    The following are links to three articles about the first ever observed formation of a planet, the discovery of a baby black hole in the midst of a supernova remnant, and the recently calculated speed of rotation of a supermassive black hole (respectively). All of which I think clearly involve the topics discussed in daniel’s ‘Geochronology’.

    http://www.weather.com/news/science/space/alien-planet-forming-20130228

    http://www.weather.com/news/science/space/rainbow-colored-cloud-baby-black-hole-20130219

    http://www.weather.com/news/science/space/supermassive-black-hole-spins-fast-20130228

    I’d love to open a discussion on what daniel and others think about these recent discoveries/observations, and how they may contradict conventional science as they develop.

    Reply
    • I’ll take a look when I get a chance.

      I’d love to open a discussion on what daniel and others think about these recent discoveries/observations, and how they may contradict conventional science as they develop.

      We have a forum for that very purpose. Click the link in the tab at the top of the window.

      Reply
  • Thank you Daniel for the Heroic work that you share! Is there any chance you be attending the Time Travel Awake & Aware Conference in Los Angeles April 5-8th?

    Reply
    • Is there any chance you be attending the Time Travel Awake & Aware Conference in Los Angeles April 5-8th?

      David Wilcock invited me (even offered to pay me), but conference lectures really aren’t my thing. I think he wanted to surprise Preston Nichols (not that he’d remember a lowly tech like myself, and it was 30 years–and 150 pounds–ago! I probably would not have remember him if it wasn’t for those home videos he started doing).

      David and I were discussing doing an interview and workshop on secret science at a future conference in the Denver area. But it would just be for a small group, not a big conference.

      Reply
  • this means that even if the ice melt there will be no water raising,isn’t it?

    Reply
    • this means that even if the ice melt there will be no water raising,isn’t it?

      Water is constantly being produced underground, so the level is always going up. Good thing the earth expands, or we’d be waterworld by now.

      The ice caps are a recent development. If you look at the old maps, they show the polar zones as ice free. It wasn’t until after the deluge that we had polar caps. Guess you can thank Enlil for that.

      Reply
  • Daniel please reconsider your decision in attending the Time Travel conference April 5-8. I believe your participation would be very important and extremely well received. It would also provide the opportunity for the extraordinary information you have published on this website to reach many times more people. Thank you

    Reply
  • This may not be a welcome comment, but it appears to me that Obama is getting increasingly out of control when it comes to his feeling justified about removing people who get in his way, or simply become inconvenient; maybe if they just MIGHT become an inconvenience! Daniel, like the rest of us here I really treasure your contributions, and while I think you’re definitely something of a wizard, I harbor no illusions that you’re bulletproof! Stay home, put your feet up, start a nice game of chess with somebody, okay? And KEEP WRITING, PLEASE! I don’t know about you, but I’m allergic to fast-moving metal, especially lead, and this paranoid and multiply insane government bought a bit over two BILLION hollow-point rounds just recently. Then there’s all the high-tech stuff they have to play with that we’re just learning about. I’d rather allow them as few targets to try them out on as possible…

    Nvwhtohiyada, tohju! (Ani-Yunwya – Cherokee – for, “Peace to you, my friend!”)

    Ian

    Reply
  • My comment has been hanging out all alone on the main page of the article for a while now, so I will throw this question into the mix here. Please forgive me if it has been addressed already. Anyway, it has been extremely confusing working through all of the different theories about the moon landings. Do we know who actually got there, and how? Looking forward to the next article. Aloha.

    Reply
  • Thanks Daniel for this recent paper. You bring great clarity to human history and its origins on our very young planet.
    Rick

    Reply
  • thank you very much Daniel for mercilessly blowing my mind, some fragments of my brain are still laying on the floor (not had the time to recollect them all). That will be much appreciates to read the part two and maybe a kind of chronology of events, very helpfull for put back my brain toghever in order. I really insist for the part two, even in an incomplete form.Pleaaaaaaase

    Reply
  • Dear Daniel, if you have time to read it, can you tell me what do you think about this article?

    Reply
  • Does it really matter how old we and our universe is?

    Reply
  • Hi Daniel- I love the work you’ve presented and have been waiting with baited breath for part two!
    I’ve been checking back almost daily since part one came out!
    Thanks!

    Reply

Add Comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*